George Washington
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
434  Miranda DiBiasio JR 20:49
648  Macaulay Porter SR 21:08
1,334  Gabby Vlattas FR 21:52
1,409  Ariana North SR 21:57
1,421  Halley Brown SO 21:58
1,430  Madison Yerke SO 21:58
1,530  Suzanne Dannheim FR 22:05
2,336  Kelli Stetson SO 22:56
2,646  Lauren Anderson SO 23:25
2,877  Lesley Fatica SO 23:54
2,911  Anna Zaccaria SR 23:59
3,151  Macy Evans FR 24:42
National Rank #144 of 344
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #12 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 12th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 14.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Miranda DiBiasio Macaulay Porter Gabby Vlattas Ariana North Halley Brown Madison Yerke Suzanne Dannheim Kelli Stetson Lauren Anderson Lesley Fatica Anna Zaccaria
Salty Dog Invitational 09/10 1178 20:39 21:49 22:11 22:18 23:16 24:59
Paul Short Invitational (Gold) 10/01 1133 20:38 21:02 21:40 21:54 22:02 22:26 22:04 23:00
Princeton Invitational 10/15 1170 20:51 21:08 22:20 21:59 21:56 21:53 22:12 23:51 23:22 23:48 23:58
Atlantic 10 Championship 10/29 1201 21:36 21:01 21:58 22:46 21:44 21:50 22:00 22:58 23:39 23:45
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/11 1177 20:46 21:35 21:42 22:03 22:01





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 12.5 398 0.1 0.7 3.4 10.2 17.8 25.2 16.6 11.6 7.1 4.3 2.1 0.9 0.5



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Miranda DiBiasio 2.9% 198.3
Macaulay Porter 0.0% 198.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Miranda DiBiasio 33.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.7 1.4 2.5 1.8 2.7 2.3 2.8
Macaulay Porter 52.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4
Gabby Vlattas 103.9
Ariana North 109.8
Halley Brown 111.0
Madison Yerke 111.4
Suzanne Dannheim 119.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.1% 0.1 7
8 0.7% 0.7 8
9 3.4% 3.4 9
10 10.2% 10.2 10
11 17.8% 17.8 11
12 25.2% 25.2 12
13 16.6% 16.6 13
14 11.6% 11.6 14
15 7.1% 7.1 15
16 4.3% 4.3 16
17 2.1% 2.1 17
18 0.9% 0.9 18
19 0.5% 0.5 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0